With a box office total of 689 million yuan, the highest in Chinese wuxia film history, and 18 award submissions, “The Legend of the Condor Heroes: The Great Hero” appeared to be a strong contender this awards season. However, when the nominations for the 44th Hong Kong Film Awards were announced, the film received none, sparking widespread discussion.

Directed by Tsui Hark and starring Xiao Zhan, the film was released during the 2025 Spring Festival period and delivered impressive commercial results. It submitted entries for 18 categories, including Best Film, Best Director, Best Actor, and Best Actress. In contrast, other films such as “Sons of the Neon Night” received 12 nominations, highlighting the gap between submission and final recognition.
Prior to the announcement, media speculation had fueled expectations regarding potential acting nominations. Yet under the Hong Kong Film Awards system, submission is merely the first step; nominations are determined through voting by a professional judging panel. The outcome ultimately reflects the evaluative standards of the jury.

From a commercial standpoint, the film was undeniably successful. It broke wuxia box office records and reinforced Xiao Zhan’s market appeal. However, audience reviews were mixed, with ratings hovering slightly above 5 out of 10 on major platforms. While some viewers praised its grand battle scenes and patriotic themes, others criticized aspects of its adaptation and character development.
The nominations this year once again underscored the Hong Kong Film Awards’ long-standing inclination toward local productions and veteran actors, shaped by its voting structure and industry composition.
The situation has reignited debate over the relationship between commercial success and professional recognition. Strong box office numbers do not automatically translate into award nominations, as market popularity and artistic evaluation operate under different criteria. For actors transitioning from popularity-driven fame to critical acclaim, sustained performance and diverse roles often play a crucial role.
Ultimately, the film’s experience reflects an ongoing question within the Chinese-language film industry: how should commercial achievement and artistic merit be weighed? The answer may lie not in opposition, but in understanding that they represent distinct yet equally significant measures of cinematic value.